|
Post by Dragon Man on Oct 5, 2015 13:35:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by fondofchips on Oct 5, 2015 15:22:38 GMT
Nice find Ken, better quality pictures than I expected too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2015 18:03:12 GMT
Nice find Ken, better quality pictures than I expected too. I believe they carried the old large format Hasselblad cameras. Pretty much top of the line back then but NASA was never know to be overly frugal with its equipment. Here's a newer one gizmodo.com/5805749/200-megapixel-hasselblad-camera-costs-45000Does anyone know if these would make a good Near Live Viewing astro camera?
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Man on Oct 6, 2015 6:00:15 GMT
Nice find Ken, better quality pictures than I expected too. I believe they carried the old large format Hasselblad cameras. Pretty much top of the line back then but NASA was never know to be overly frugal with its equipment. Here's a newer one gizmodo.com/5805749/200-megapixel-hasselblad-camera-costs-45000Does anyone know if these would make a good Near Live Viewing astro camera? Nah, no good for Astro. Only goes up to 800 iso. and it takes 30 seconds to upload a simple 800 iso image. And a simple single frame 800 iso image is 600Mb in size! It also has extremely tiny pixels. All the specs are exactly the opposite to what we need
|
|