elpajare
Member
Posts: 438
home town/country: Girona-Spain
time zone gmt +/-: 1
|
Post by elpajare on Oct 31, 2019 8:20:12 GMT
From Aliexpress/RisingCam
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Man on Oct 31, 2019 8:42:29 GMT
Thanks Carlos. My favourite capture program! Downloading the update now
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Man on Oct 31, 2019 8:49:19 GMT
Ooooo, I like all the new icons down the left hand side.
|
|
elpajare
Member
Posts: 438
home town/country: Girona-Spain
time zone gmt +/-: 1
|
Post by elpajare on Oct 31, 2019 10:05:19 GMT
The Deep Sky option from Stacking works faster now
The Sharpen option gives a little more detail to the objects, I set it to 100 before starting to stack.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Man on Oct 31, 2019 10:17:07 GMT
I don't use the Sharpen feature but I'll give it a try. Sharpening normally tends to create too many artifacts. I have had trouble with stacking 'Deep Sky' frames. I hope it is fixed now. It worked great in early versions of RisingSky a couple of years ago. I only ever stack a maximum of 3 frames but lately it still took too long or never stacked at all. Hopefully it's fixed now
|
|
elpajare
Member
Posts: 438
home town/country: Girona-Spain
time zone gmt +/-: 1
|
Post by elpajare on Oct 31, 2019 10:28:53 GMT
In my opinion, the problem of DeepSky option is typical that the software does not find enough stars to align.
It happens to me in small galaxies with little starfield around.
Things that cause it:
To use a very small FOV that leaves few background stars Sky with parasitic light that hides the weakest stars (Moon, etc ...) Sky with high clouds or fog that hides stars too.
The summary is that the software does not find enough bright stars to be able to align. Now it works well for me as long as the things I've said before don't happen. If they happen ... to use Planet.
With Planet there seems to be more tolerance and it works well in these extreme cases where DeepSky is not doing well.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Man on Oct 31, 2019 10:40:26 GMT
Things that cause it: To use a very small FOV that leaves few background stars Sky with parasitic light that hides the weakest stars (Moon, etc ...) Sky with high clouds or fog that hides stars too. Makes sense. I regularly use stacking in planetary mode on Planets and the Moon. Using stacking on frames as fast as 1/500th of a second on Jupiter and 1/1000th of a second on the Moon is un-noticable when stacking x3. It smoothes out the video. I will try Planetary mode on Deep Sky objects.
|
|
elpajare
Member
Posts: 438
home town/country: Girona-Spain
time zone gmt +/-: 1
|
Post by elpajare on Oct 31, 2019 10:44:58 GMT
It will work perfectly for these cases with few stars in the background
Of course, it takes 14 seconds to process each image before stacking. With DeepSky only 4 seconds.....
They are tricks that the Chinese do not explain, haha
|
|